‘Does EGO benefit from FURY?

By Harsimran Kaur

What do you call such a war where FURY is unleashed in epic proportion?

Fatous fury! Ferro-ethics around a cornered fury!

Wasn’t the rising fury of Trump supposed to abate the storm of Iranian imprudence; he calls them a lunatic regime, and wasn’t he aware that such a war would insidiously penetrate the walls of ‘ego’ of a theoretic Iranian government? If he still thinks it is a crippled convulsed nation, it’s time to dishonour such persistence because the retaliation by Iran has impinged an ego-driven individualism.

What is ‘self’ like the self of Trump, Bibi and Khamenei that’s governs such idiosyncratic patterns? They act as if no one is watching, and then they don’t care of impressions. Talking of moral rectitude, it lies in abeyance. Now, in such a state of ‘self’, ego has the power to open the unconscious to bring the ‘self’ into a preservation mode, where it remains protected. Last one month, we see the leaders of US and Israel constructing a self-serving rhetoric.

‘Ego’ thus becomes the ragione di vivere!    

I often feel now that the world is under a power crisis where a country through autotelic intellectualism serves it megalomanic profundity, thus discrediting the ‘other’ because it feels, and such feeling can be dangerous, a kind of prophetism binding on the ‘ego’. It thus acts like a solipsistic subject in defiance to the dissolute intellect of the ‘other’.    

The question now arises that if such idiosyncrasies are perfectly moulded to one’s inventiveness; is such shrewdness equal to profanity?

Trump’s exhibitionism and barefaced frigidity have turned this war into a battlefield of disquiet hostility and egotistical entrenchment. Is TRUMP a perfect symbolism of a soi-distant rationalist or a flip-flopping capricious mercurial who kills the Supreme Leader of Iran, and then in self-deprecating humour tell the world that he was asked to be the new leader but effortlessly said ‘NO’.

Isn’t it a propinquity to ‘ego’?   

Individualism has great capacity for illusions. These illusions carry narratives, self-imposed, to not forget that the foremost pleasure of humans is to protect themselves. Self-sustaining actions are thus percipient of one’s goals but in the alchemy of such assertions, arises an incendiary issue of conflict.

The TRUMP saga is hilarious. He is the BOSS or is the solipsistic make-belief MAGA supremo, now turned into MIGA (Make Iran Great Again). One thing Trump needs to conciliate with is that ‘Khamenei’ is dead. The other thing he must consider is that any political intrusions always turn rebellious. More than 4300 missiles have been launched by Iran, and the Middle East has come under a nefarious stratagem. His vision to destroy humanity has been met with obloquy. What is his aim then?

Is it to obliterate the puritanical Iranian mindset or mutilate the Uranium enrichment fomenting a nuclear threat, which would also mean to cut the ground under the IRGC, and now I see that Trump has turned into a meticulous redemptionist to free the people of Iran from brutality of a regime that has splurged a sleet of bans and blemishes on women, their freedom, and if havoc is presumably a discretion then Iran has played many; United States is not far behind.  

He is the perfect antagonist; he got Khamenei before he got him, and if that wasn’t a blasphemy to the Iranians, Trump has a bag full of notoriety,

“There is nobody to talk to, we have nobody to talk to. And you know what – we like it that way”

His sentience has made him an uncouth dissenter.

He is still counting the pearls, I guess, when he left the Japanese PM brushing her own wisdom. The Pearl Harbour was attacked without prior warning; Trump felt the obligation to follow in situ.

Coming back to the ego wrath, annihilation of an ideology is a war of ego; a war that surpasses the diplomatic and foreign policy doctrine, and such ‘ego’ that Trump exhibits is also an outcome of boredom. A war, not implied, but implored by the disillusioned mind of Trump; can such a war eradicate Iranian totalitarianism? Or Trump is waging a war so that the war can save the people of Iran; Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

If that were the case, would we witness another rebellion in Iranian history, if it were to be, of people slipping in depredations, arguing for a democratic state not based on religious autocracy?

What about the psychological despondency triggered for the Iranians with their Supreme Leader dead? The people, under an imprecation for so long, no doubt, still carry years of sentimental belonging, and now to be left like a fallen leaf crushed by foreign intervention, seeing their belonging muddled up with western eccentricities, an unstable president whose onslaught is fatigued with ‘me, my ego’; there has been no regime change as of now and Uranium still lies in abundance, is it easy for them to fracture such immanence; a decoded ontology lived for the last forty years?

A Tickle-Wickle for Mr. Trump—ARE you are still there from where you started?

Trump is all optimistic but I hope it does not turn out to be a schadenfreude at the expense of Iran. His self-deprecating humour is in fact an ego-boost to his all-prevailing psychological confinement of ribald and superfluity. Wake up, Mr Trump! Your subjective sophistries are
only reckoning the world to move away from this impressionistic war that has become a mutated monstrosity of impulses rotten in protean randomness.

Of what is this war?

Is it a war of necessity where Trump is the soothsayer to objectify the future of Iran?

Or, it’s a war of moral consciousness, almost tarnished, and the egomaniacal pursuits are separating the multi-polar world from a strategic conglomerate of unity?

The uprising in Iran in 2026 is a grotesque simulacrum of the 1947 Islamist revolution, and one can look forward to a similar insinuation on the roads in the months to come. Didn’t Trump usurp the interior turbulence of January 2026 caused by non-transparency of intentions, economic crisis, shortage of food supply?

When did Iranians beckon Trump to be their deus ex machina, or is it the disillusionment that US took the freedom movement of Iran seriously?

He authorises rather provocatively,

“One of the things I am going to be asking for its ability to work with them on choosing a new leader. I am not going through this to end up with another Khamenei. They can select, but we have to make sure its somebody that is reasonable to the United States.”

When has United States not been the punitive shadow lurking in darkness as a ghoulish to devour the resistance? Let’s go back a bit. In the 1953 coup (Operation Ajax), the US and the UK, to reverse the nationalization of Iranian oil overthrew the then Iran’s PM Mohammad Mosaddegh and returned power to Shah. Trump continues the legacy of meddling in matters of other countries. After creating oil crisis around the world, for him, it’s a burnout profligacy. He does not need the Strait of Hormuz. His auguries always boiling in the cauldron; the fire below on which he lives like a salamander, and then a sudden squall extinguishes the flame, and then he is quick like a mythical lizard to enter another conflagration. In the end, everything turns out, for him, a damp squib.

“We have so much oil. We don’t need oil at all. Our country is not affected by this. We have twice the amount of oil as Saudi Arabia or Russia.”

In his nuances to prevaricate questions, his stories pirouette around his own insipid adventures as if he were not a president with a moral duty but a progenitor of autotelic governance, resorting to dilettantes and puns.

Doesn’t all this amount to an ego sublimed in hubristic divinity?

So, what is the analysis till April 02, 2026?

Trump’s war has become a war of entanglement; a desirous, deranged ideological fundamentals in play. Trump’s war is of the perspective and the proscriptive. In the disillusionment of his sentiments, power, the despicable curiosity, and in such reprehensibility from the associated alliances, Trump is in a mood to amuse the Iranians,

 

“When we are finished, take over your government. This is a moment for action. Do not let it pass.” 

All this looks like a mistaken belief turning into a faux pass! What we foresee is the Shais’ & Sunnis’ divided, more so, and the NATO disintegrating into a fail-safe, and if the war began as contretemps and the counterpoints contorted, today, Trump finds a crevice in his perspective quibbling, and his attempt to be susurrus while giving speeches; so dogged in his blandishments that such superiority rings a piteous call to the world to hide and be wrapped in a fretful silence.

He considers himself a visionary but certainly not of humanity. He has turned out to be a dictator fundamentally being in charge of the socio-cultural ethos that suit his ideological obstinacy, even if it means washing off the Iranian Supreme Leader so that its people can create their fertile detailing of assertive expressionism. Will they?

Let’s get a bit judgemental. Trump, an enfant terrible, sitting in encampment, en masse, extrapolating his rule book to rule, looks up at the empyrean; so clear is the sky, and such clarity worries him and therefore, he is ready to strike words in an enfilade and through copious military disbursements. The world, its people, now sit at the ripper’s edge or have they become the raptor? For Trump, the bete noire Iranians must be shredded for the world to be a better place.

The question now arises that by throwing avalanche of missiles and artilleries, can ideological sentimentality be dissolved of the people who considered Khamenei an apostle of God, and such disposition by Trump to take back their revered virtues; will it turn out to be in flagrante delicto? 

WHERE HAS TRUMP LED THE IRANIANS AND THE WORLD TO?

• • A disruptive country trying to protect itself, is now isolated with diminutive support from the Muslim counterparts. There may be psychological damage, an exploitation, an annihilation of beliefs, and a new lease of propaganda has emerged to outstrip disassociations in the name of threatened vulgarities. Iran, today, is forsaken. 

• • We are also seeing a geo-political shift where countries are protecting their own tarmac. India stands with contrapuntal. It is not a go-between country like Pakistan. It prefers to construct a scaffolding to protect its economic interest and sovereignty.

• • Trump has plastered NATO as perfidious and has no compunction to call UK aircrafts as toys. That’s unbalanced power circle we don’t wish to see in the near future.

WHAT WOULD HELP TRUMP OR ACTUALLY WAKE HIM UP?

• • With such schizophrenic splits and sclerotic interference, a therapy around humanization is important.

• • Other countries can provide deimmunization to help restore balance and deescalate the war.

• • With mid-term elections coming up, Trump can be outset as a failure to keep up to his word of avoiding wars and interventions. The citizens are discouraged with marked inflation ready to seize their economy, and in such distress, Trump awaits sleepless nights. He prefers to doze off in the chair that holds the momentum of the entire country.

Even though his psychological fits continue, one day would come when Iran will become a futility, and Cuba will be the new scrofula. I don’t have a clue if Venezuela still exits.